← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./32250/2021bail rejected

Rajan Tiwari @ Rajan Kumar Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar

2021-12-16Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32250 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-50 Year-2019 Thana- RAXAUL RAIL P.S. District- West Champaran ====================================================== RAJAN TIWARI @ RAJAN KUMAR TIWARI Sonof Krishna Tiwari @ Krishna Bihari Tiwari Resident of Village- Shreepur, P.S.- Chhauradano, District- East Champaran, Motihari.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Prem Kumar Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 16-12-2021 Heard Mr. Rajesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Prem Kumar Jha, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Raxaul GRP Case No. 50/2019 registered for the offence punishable under Section 394 of the IPC and 27 of the Arms Act, later on Sections 414 & 411 IPC were added. As, per prosecution case, four unknown miscreants on the gun point looted away Rs. 42,000/- and a Samsung Mobile from the informant. It is further alleged that the miscreants also fired upon the brother of the informant.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and he has been made

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32250 of 2021(2) dt.16-12-2021 2/2 accused in this case on the basis of confessional statement. Learned counsel next submits that petitioner is in custody since 10.09.2020 and the charge-sheet, in the matter, has already been submitted.

Regards being had to the submissions made by the parties and taking into consideration the material on record and the fact that petitioner has got criminal antecedents as recorded in the order impugned, I am not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner. The same is, hereby, rejected. Petitioner, if so advised, may renew his prayer for regular bail after six months from today if the trial does not record any progress.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J) perwez U T