Ashok Rai v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17347 of 2015 ====================================================== Ashok Rai Son of Late Ram Narayan Rai, Resident of Village of Sattaur, Tola Koyla, P.S. Nauhatta, District- Saharsa.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Commissioner, Koshi Division, Saharsa.

5.

The District Magistrate, Saharsa.

6.

The District Teachers Appointment Appellate Authority, Saharsa. 7.

The District Education Officer, Saharsa.

8.

The District Programme Officer Establishment, Saharsa. 9.

The Block Education Officer, Nauhatta, P.S. and Block Nauhatta, DistrictSaharsa. 10.

The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Sattour, P.S. Nauhatta District Saharsa. 11.

The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Sattour, P.S. Nauhatta, DistrictSaharsa. 12.

Rambadan Kumar Son of Late Siyaram Rai, Resident of Sattour, Tola Koyla, P.S. Nauhatta, District- Saharsa.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amarnath Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Prashant Pratap, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 09-02-2024

1. The petitioner has filed the instant application for the following reliefs:

"(1) For setting aside the order dated 04.11.14 passed by the District (Teachers Appointment) appellate Authority Saharsa whereby and whereunder the Appeal No. 22 of 2014 preferred by the present petitioner against the appointment of the Respondent No. 12 on the post of Shiksha Mitra who was subsequently made Panchayat Teacher.

(ii) For direction upon the other respondents to

Patna High Court CWJC No.17347 of 2015(4) dt.09-02-2024 2/2 remove the respondent No.12 who got selection / appointment on the basis of forged certificate. (iii) For direction for recovery of salaries paid to the respondent No. 12 whose appointment is based on forged certificate.

(iv) For any other relief(s) to which petitioner may be found entitled in the facts and circumstances of the case."

2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application.

3. This application is dismissed as withdrawn. (Partha Sarthy, J) Bibhash/- U