Patna High CourtL.P.A/1741/2015dismissed

Diwakar Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-05-17Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh,The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1741 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 22907 of 2013 With Interlocutory Application No. 7836 of 2015.

====================================================== Diwakar Kumar, Son of Late Ramashray Yadav, Resident of Village - Bankatwa, P.S. Jitna, District - East Champaran .... .... Appellant / Petitioner.

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Collector, East Champaran

2. The District Superintendent of Education, East Champaran

3. The Block Development Officer, Bankatwa Block District - East Champaran

4. The Mukhiya, Bankatwa Panchayat, Bankatwa, District - East Champaran

5. The Panchayat Secretary, Bankatwa Panchayat District - East Champaran

6. Arun Kumar Mishra Son of Sri Ram Autar Mishra Resident of Bankatwa, P.S. Jitha, District - East Champaran, at present posted as Panchayat Teacher, Madhya Vidyalay, Simri, Bankatwa District - East Champaran

7. Brij Kishore Prasad Son of Keshri Lal Prasad Resident of Bankatwa, P.S. Jitha, District - East Champaran, at present posted as Panchayat Teacher, Madhya Vidyalay, Simri, Bankatwa District - East Champaran .... .... Respondents / Respondents.

====================================================== Appearance:

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Amarendra Kumar, AC to AAG 13. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 17-05-2017 I.A. No. 7836 of 2015 is allowed.

Re. L.P.A. No. 1741 of 2015.

In the matter of relief to be granted to the petitioner, a Panchayat Teacher, the learned Writ Court has dismissed the Writ Petition in view of the law laid down in Kalpana Rani v. State of

Patna High Court LPA No.1741 of 2015 (8) dt.17-05-2017 2/2 Bihar & Ors. [2014 (2) PLJR 665].

Having heard learned counsels for the parties, we see no reason to interfere into the matter. The appeal is dismissed. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Sudhir Singh, J) Dilip, AR U