Anand Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.72686 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-441 Year-2018 Thana- PATLIPUTRA District- Patna ====================================================== Anand Kumar, S/o Sri Jay Narayan Yadav @ Jay Nath Yadav, resident of Village- Balua, P.S. Laukhi, District- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bhaskar Shankar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Aditya Narayan Singh 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 11-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Patliputra P.S. Case No. 441 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against petitioner is impersonation during examination and appearing for a different person in his name and for which forged admit card and I card was prepared. He was apprehended while entering the examination centre. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since25.09.2018.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.72686 of 2018(2) dt.11-12-2018 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Patna, in connection with Patliputra P.S. Case No. 441 of 2018 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T