Patna High CourtCWJC/5955/2000dfd for non appearance

Sk.Mahboob Alam @ Sk.Mahboob And v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-11-10Mr. Justice Birendra Prasad Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5955 of 2000 ======================================================

1. Sk.Mahboob Alam alias Sk.Mahboob

2. Sk.Mushtaque Alam

3. Sk.Jamshed Alam alias Sk.Jamshed

4. Bibi Nehar Petitioner nos. 1 to 3 are sons and petitioner no.4 is daughter of Late Shamsul Zoba

5. Nurul Hoda son of Late Abdul Ghaffar

6. Md.Mujib

7. Md.Haidar

8. Bibi Mahajabeen

9. Bibi Jahan Ara Begun

10. Zafera Begun Petitioner nos. 6 & 7 are sons and petitioner nos. 8 to 10 are daughters of Late Habibur Rahman

11. Sk.Imamuddin alias Imamuddin son of Sk. Ebadullah

12. Bibi Amna Khatoon

13. Bibi Zulekha Petitioner Nos. 12 & 13 are daughters of Sk.Ebadullah All the petitioners are residents of Village Malikpur, P.S.Balrampur, District Katihar .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Sri Jagannath Sharma, Deputy Director of Consolidation, Purnea

3. Deputy Director of Consolidation, Katihar

4. Sheikh Ekramuddin

5. Sheikh Usman Ghani

6. Sheikh Sulaiman Respondent Nos. 4 to 6 are sons of Late Ehsanul Haque and residents of Village Malikpur, Police Station Balrampur, District Katihar

7. Md.Abdul Bashir son of Late Md.Israil

8. Bibi Amna Khatoon

9. Bibi Taimun Nisan

10. Bibi Akbari Begum Respondent nos. 8 to 10 are daughters of Late Md.Ayub

11. Md.Siddique

12. Md.Zafiruddin Respondent Nos. 11 and 12 are sons of Late Md.Ayub

13. Bibi Gul Chehra daughter of Late Md.Ayub Respondent Nos. 7 to 13 are residents of Village Bagdob, Police Station Baisee, District Purnea .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent Nos. 4 to 13 : Mr. Najmul Hoda, Advocate Mr.Arjun Prasad, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER

Patna High Court CWJC No.5955 of 2000 (4) dt.10-11-2016 2/2 10-11-2016 Despite repeated calls, none appears on behalf of the petitioners in support of the present writ petition, though the names of the learned counsel appearing on their behalf are printed in the daily cause list.

Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.

(Birendra Prasad Verma, J) Tahir/- U