Patna High CourtCR. MISC./51958/2016bail granted

Dilip Tanti @ Dilip Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2016-12-07Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.51958 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -107 Year- 2015 Thana -INDUSTRIAL District- BHAGALPUR ======================================================

1. Dilip Tanti @ Dilip Kumar Son of Wakil Tanti resident of village - Surkhikal Batha, P.S. Barari, District - Bhagalpur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Praveen Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Khurshid Anwar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 07-12-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. representing for the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer for bail, which was earlier rejected vide order dated 05.05.2016 passed in Criminal Misc. No. 12610 of 2016, on the ground that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 12.12.2015 the trial has not been concluded within the stipulated period and up till now only two prosecution witnesses have been examined and in near future the trial is not likely to be concluded. The petitioner was given liberty to renew his prayer for bail.

The learned A.P.P., submits that from the house of the petitioner looted mobile was recovered on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51958 of 2016 (2) dt.07-12-2016 2/2 In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the custody of the petitioner now the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Learned Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Bhagalpur in connection with Session Trial No. 333 of 2016 arising out of Industrial P.S. Case No. 107 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) siddharth/- U T