← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./31894/2021bail rejected

Satendra Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

2022-02-24Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31894 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-255 Year-2020 Thana- BAIKUNTHPUR District- Gopalganj ====================================================== 1.

SATENDRA PRASAD S/o Sheonarayan Prasad R/o village- Sonewalia, P.S.- Baikunthpur, District- Gopalganj, Bihar 2.

BIJENDRA PRASAD S/o Sheonarayan Prasad R/o village- Sonewalia, P.S.- Baikunthpur, District- Gopalganj, Bihar ... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Indrajeet Bhushan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Zainul Abedin, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-02-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Baikunthpur P.S. Case No. 255 of 2020, registered for the offence punishable under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Gopalganj.

Considering the allegation that the petitioners have assaulted on the head of the father of informant by means of Farsa, which took his life. The allegation is corroborated by the finding of the Doctor in the Postmortem Report. The informant is the eye-witness of the occurrence, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail, at this stage. Accordingly, the prayer for

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31894 of 2021(4) dt.24-02-2022 2/2 grant of regular bail is rejected.

However, the learned trial Court is directed to conclude the trial expeditiously, well within a period of nine months. If no substantial progress takes place in trial, the petitioner, if so advised, may renew his prayer for bail after nine month.

(Purnendu Singh, J) manish/- U T