← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./22356/2020bail granted

Jitendra Kumar Yadav @ Jitendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2020-09-10Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22356 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-30 Year-2020 Thana- NAWANAGAR District- Buxar ====================================================== JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV @ JITENDRA YADAV Son of Lal Mohar Singh Resident of Village - Jagdhara, P.S. - Dawath, District - Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mohit Shriwastava For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pranav Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-09-2020 Due to COVID-19 Pandemic, the matter is being taken up by way of virtual Court proceeding.

The matter has been listed under the heading 'For Orders' under the orders of Hon'ble the Chief Justice. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks from the date of lifting of the lockdown in the State of Bihar. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation is that three unknown miscreants after assaulting the informant snatched Rs.1 lac from his coat pocket and also snatched a mobile phone.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22356 of 2020(2) dt.10-09-2020 2/2 petitioner is in custody since 6.2.2020. Charge sheet has been submitted in this case. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. His name has transpired in this case on disclosure made by co-accused. No T.I.P. was conducted to ascertain the participation of the petitioner in the alleged occurrence. Two mobile phones are said to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Said mobile phones have not been put on T.I.P. to ascertain whether it is looted article or not. The recovered mobile phones in question belong to the petitioner.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in connection with Nawanagar P.S. case No.30 of 2020. (Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T