Patna High CourtCR. MISC./23647/2017dismissed

Ram Snehi Kumar v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2018-01-31Mr. Justice Ashwani Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.23647 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -2241 Year- 2010 Thana -GAYA COMPLAINT CASE District- GAYA =========================================================== Ram Snehi Kumar, son of Siya Sharan Paswan, resident of village-Tetar, Shiv Nagar Tola, P.S.-Atri, District-Gaya .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Sunita Devi, wife of Ram Snehi Kumar, daughter of Nanhku Paswan, resident of village-Punar, P.S.-Atri, District-Gaya.

.... .... Opposite Party =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None For the Opposite Party/s : None =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 31-01-2018 Despite repeated calls, nobody appears to press the application.

2. This application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short 'Cr. P.C.') has been filed by the petitioner for quashing the order dated 09.11.2011 passed by the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in Complaint Case No.2241 of 2010 by which cognizance has been taken for the offence punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act has been taken and the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23647 of 2017 dt.31-01-2018 petitioner has been summoned to face trial.

3. In the complaint, it is alleged that after marriage the complainant went to her sasural where the petitioner, who is her husband and relatives subjected her to cruelty in various ways for non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.

4. The complainant has supported the allegation made in the complaint in her statement made on oath and apart from the complainant, certain witnesses were also examined in course of inquiry under Section 202 of the Cr. P.C., who all have supported the case of the complainant.

5. In that view of the matter, I see no illegality in the order impugned whereby the petitioner has been summoned to face trial.

6. The application, being devoid of any merit, is dismissed.

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.) Sanjeet/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 02.02.2018 Transmission Date 02.02.2018