Hifzur Rahman @ Hizbur Rahman @ Md. Efzul Rahman @ Md. Hizbur Rahman v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.50405 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -21 Year- 2015 Thana -SAJOUR District- BHAGALPUR ======================================================

1. Hifzur Rahman @ Hizbur Rahman @ Md. Efzul Rahman @ Md. Hizbur Rahman, son of Md. Salim, Resident of Village- Chandpur, P.S. Sajour, District- Bhagalpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Nurul Hoda For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Khurshid Anwar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 21-12-2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P for the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer for bail which was earlier rejected by order dated 23.06.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 15530 of 2016 on the ground that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 30.10.2015, FIR has been lodged after much delay, no offence as alleged is made out and in near future the trial is not likely to be concluded.

The learned A.P.P. opposes prayer for bail by submitting that the petitioner exploded bomb causing serious injury in the right eye of 4 1⁄2 years female child and the medical report also supports the allegation.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50405 of 2016 (3) dt.21-12-2016 2/2 In the facts and circumstances as stated above, considering detention of the petitioner and further that there is no chance of tampering with the prosecution evidence and as such the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.D.J- IV, Bhagalpur in S.T. No. 167 of 2016 arising out of Sajour (Sahkund) P.S. Case No. 21 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Abhay/- U T