Rajendra Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.50302 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -188 Year- 2015 Thana -BUNIADGANJ District- GAYA ====================================================== Rajendra Paswan S/o Nanhak Paswan resident of Village - Makhdumpur, P.S. - Rafiganj, District - Aurangabad, At present residing at Manpur, Kachi Sangat in the house of Kishori Paswan, P.S. - Buniadganj, District - Gaya. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravindra Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nityanand ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 30-11-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew the prayer of bail, which was earlier rejected by order dated 05.05.2016 passed in Cri. Misc. No. 12142 of 2016 on the ground that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 01.10.2015 and he was given liberty to renew the prayer of bail if the trial is not concluded within a period of six months and the trial has not been concluded and up till now no prosecution witness has been examined. Learned A.P.P. in the light of observation made in earlier order does not oppose the prayer of bail. In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50302 of 2016 (2) dt.30-11-2016 2/2 execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with S. T. No. 3413 of 2016, arising out of Buniadganj P.S. Case No.188 of 2015, subject to conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Amit/- U T