Lalita Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22411 of 2017 (2) dt.11-05-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.22411 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -44 Year- 2017 Thana -AJAMNAGAR District- KATIHAR ======================================================

1. Lalita Devi Wife of Pradip Rai Resident of Village- Porla, P.S. Azam Nagar, District- Katihar.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Dewashish Das @ Fujku Das Son of Sobendra Nath Das

3. Sappan Das Son of Sobendra Nath Das

4. Sabita Devi Wife of Sobendra Nath Das All are Resident of Porla, P.S. Azamnagar, District Katihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Madan Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-05-2017 From the materials on record, it transpires that the petitioner is aggrieved by an order, dated 24.03.2017 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge I, Cum-Special Judge, Katihar in Azamnagar P. S. Case No. 44 of 2017, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 307, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(i) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The present application has been filed under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for cancellation of bail. In my view, this application is not maintainable. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22411 of 2017 (2) dt.11-05-2017 learned Court below, there is remedy under Section 14A of the scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

This application is, accordingly, dismissed.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) ArunKumar/- U