Dhiraj Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23297 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-417 Year-2021 Thana- BIKRAMGANJ District- Rohtas ====================================================== DHIRAJ KUMAR SINGH Son of Arjun Singh @ Arjun Yadav Resident of village - Norowna, P.S.- Bikramganj, District - Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Anbzarul Haque Sahara ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 22-07-2022 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State through virtual Court proceedings.

Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bikramganj P.S. Case No. 417 of 2021 registered for the offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.

The accused/petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and is in custody since 31.01.2022.

The allegation against the petitioner is to be engaged in illegal trade of illicit liquor, where, there is recovery of 672.5 litres of IMFL.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23297 of 2022(2) dt.22-07-2022 2/3 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that recovery has been made from house of the petitioner, which was jointly occupied by other family members, as such, it cannot be said that the alleged recovery has been made from the conscious physical possession of the petitioner. It has further been submitted that petitioner is a man of clean antecedent. While concluding the argument, it has been submitted that investigation of this case has been completed, for which, charge-sheet has already been submitted, as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.

Learned APP, while opposing the prayer of bail, fairly conceded the fact that recovery was made from jointly occupied house.

Considering the facts and circumstances as mentioned above, as the alleged recovery has not been made from the conscious physical possession of the petitioner, who is a man of clean antecedent coupled with the fact that charge-sheet has already been submitted, let the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail in connection with Bikramganj P.S. Case No. 417 of 2021 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23297 of 2022(2) dt.22-07-2022 3/3 Judge-2-cum-Special Judge Excise, Rohtas at Sasaram/concerned court, subject to the following conditions: "(i)Accused/Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be physically present on each and every date before the Trial Court till conclusion of the trial and exemption from physical appearance be allowed by the Trial Court, only on medical ground of the petitioner duly supported by the documents.

(ii) That one of the bailors shall be Arjun Singh @ Arjun yadav, who is the father of the petitioner and deponent of the present bail petition."

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) S.Katyayan/- U T