← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./24776/2024bail granted

Sonu Singh @Mrityunjay Pratap Singh @Mritunjay Pratap Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-05Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24776 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-36 Year-2024 Thana- PAKRIDAYAL District- East Champaran ====================================================== Sonu Singh @Mrityunjay Pratap Singh @Mritunjay Pratap Singh Son Of Rameshwar Narayan Singh @ Chhedi Singh Resident Of Village- Tharbitiya, Ps- Pakaridayal, Dist- East Chaparan At Motihari ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 05-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Pakridayal P.S Case No. 36 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 326, 379, 452, 504 and 307 of the I.P.C.

3. As per prosecution case, seventeen accused persons being variously armed assaulted the informant and his son and snatched a gold chain along with cash amount.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that co-accused Rana Pratap Singh assaulted the informant's son by means of knife. It is next submitted that no

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24776 of 2024(2) dt.05-04-2024 2/2 injury report of the informant is present on the record to support such allegations, inasmuch as, the allegations are false and the informant was never examined by any doctor. It is also submitted that petitioner is in judicial custody since 14.02.2024.

5. However, learned APP for the State oppose the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

6. On perusal of the FIR, impugned order and period of custody and also considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made on behalf of the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VIII, East Champaran at Motihari in connection with Pakridayal P.S Case No. 36 of 2024.

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Mayank/- U T