Rishab Suri v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.22979 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -139 Year- 2014 Thana -PATLIPUTRA District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Rishab Suri Son of Sri Jitendra Kumar Suri R/o House No. 946 Sector 6, Hudda, Bahadurgarh, P.S. Sector 6 Bahadurgarh, Haryana - 124507, Petitioner is at present Director Security, HRH Group of Hotels, City Palace Complex, P.S. Ghantaghar, Udaipur, Rajasthan. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Iman wife of Rishab Suri, Daughter of Sri Ram Babu Kumar Sankritya R/o 304, Royal Retreat Mansion, New Patliputra Colony, P.S. Patliputra District Patna 800013.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gouranga Chatterjee, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Lalan Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 498A and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22979 of 2017 (4) dt.20-07-2017 2/2 petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. It is further submitted that a Divorce case is already pending before the Family Court. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the State and learned counsel for the informant, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Smt. Divya Mita, 1st class J.M., Patna in connection with Patliputra P.S. case No.139 of 2014, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T