Dhananjay Sharma And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22231 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-12 Year-2016 Thana- KASMA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== 1.
Dhananjay Sharma son of Kamta Sharma, resident of Village- Gajikarma, P.S.- Kasma, District- Aurangabad.
2.
Vijay Yadav, son of Late Raju Yadav, resident of Village- Gajikarma, P.S.- Kasma, District- Aurangabad.
3.
Kamlesh Sharma, son of Late Bisesar Sharma, resident of VillageGajikarma, P.S.- Kasma, District- Aurangabad. 4.
Mukesh Sharma, son of Late Dular Sharma, resident of Village- Gajikarma, P.S.- Kasma, District- Aurangabad.
5.
Sukhdeo Sharma, son of Late Dular Sharma, resident of Village- Gajikarma, P.S.- Kasma, District- Aurangabad.
6.
Sunil Sharma, son of Sukhdeo Sharma, resident of Village- Gajikarma, P.S.- Kasma, District- Aurangabad.
7.
Anil Sharma, son of Sukhdeo Sharma, resident of Village- Gajikarma, P.S.- Kasma, District- Aurangabad.
8.
Rupa Sharma, son of Sukhdeo Sharma, resident of Village- Gajikarma, P.S.- Kasma, District- Aurangabad.
9.
Kamta Sharma @ Kamta Mistri, son of Late Sheochandra Mistri, resident of Village- Gajikarma, P.S.- Kasma, District- Aurangabad. 10.
Rajendra Sharma, son of Late Komal Sharma, resident of VillageGajikarma, P.S.- Kasma, District- Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar 2.
Dularia Devi, wife of Chandradeo Choudhary, resident of VillageGajikarma, P.S.- Kasma, District- Aurangabad. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Samir Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Smt Usha Kumari No-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 27-09-2023
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22231 of 2017(2) dt.27-09-2023 2/2 permission to withdraw the present quashing application.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T