← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./51550/2013dismissed

Geeta Devi @ Geeta Kumari And ORS. v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-06-30Mr. Justice Arun Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.51550 of 2013 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -183 Year- 2013 Thana -KAHALGAON District- BHAGALPUR ======================================================

1. Geeta Devi @ Geeta Kumari W/o Ranjit Poddar.

2. Ranjit Poddar @ Mantu Poddar, Son of Late Satyanarayan Poddar @ Shatrughan Poddar.

3. Anil Poddar, Son of Bhagirath Poddar

4. Rakesh Poddar, Son of Ranvijay Poddar All residents of Village Baiju Tola (Anadipur), P.S. Khalgaon, District Bhagalpur .... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Pinki Devi W/o Sushil Poddar Resident of Village Baiju Tola, P.S.- Khalgaon, District Bhagalpur .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Davendra Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyavrat Verma(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 30-06-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. This petition is filed for setting aside the order taking cognizance dated 06.07.2013, passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur in Kahalgaon P.S. Case No.183 of 2013. The cognizance of the offence has been taken under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no prima facie case is made out against the petitioners. However, the report dated 14.06.2017 of the 3rd Additional District & Sessions Judge, Bhagalpur reflects that

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51550 of 2013 (4) dt.30-06-2017 2 / 2 already case after framing of charge is fixed for evidence so the present application has become infructuous, hence and it is dismissed.

(Arun Kumar, J.) S.Kumar/- U T