Rakesh Prasad Sinha v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5298 of 2026 ====================================================== Rakesh Prasad Sinha S/o- Aditya Narayan Prasad, Resident of Tola- Urba PSChakai, District-Jamui, Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Bihar, Patna.
3.
The District Magistrate Jamui.
4.
The Sub Divisional Officer, Jamui.
5.
The Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Jamui.
6.
The Circle Officer, Anchal Khaira, District- Jamui. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ram Kishun Prasad, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Standing Counsel (1) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 20-07-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s:
(i) for issuance of correction slip (Parimarjan) after quashing of order dated 06.01.2026 in Jammabandi No. 168 as without considering the old Jammbandi and standing in the name of petitioner, it has been recorded as Zero keshrs number in the Register-II of Anchal Record;
(ii) for further direction to respondent for considering the Parimarjan application which has been rejected by showing that the
Patna High Court CWJC No.5298 of 2026(4) dt.20-07-2026 2/2 land in question appears to be in the account of Gairmajura land;
(iii) for further direction for considering the original documents like Hukumnama issued by the then Zammindar, return, rent receipt issued by the Zammindar and thereafter rent recipts issued by the State of Bihar;
(iv) for issuance of any other relief/ reliefs for which petitioner may be found entitled in the facts and circumstances of the present case and accordingly would be relief which has not been expressed sought for.
3. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be given liberty to approach the revenue authority for the redressal of the grievance.
4. Granting said liberty and without commenting on the merit of the case, the writ petition is disposed of. (Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U