← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./22360/2020bail granted

Rahul Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2020-09-10Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22360 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-117 Year-2020 Thana- SAKRA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== RAHUL KUMAR Son of Nagdeo Rai Resident of Village - Sabha, P.S.- Sakra, District - Muzzafarpur, Bihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anish Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mritunjay Kr. Gautam.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-09-2020 Due to COVID-19 Pandemic, the matter is being taken up by way of virtual Court proceeding.

The matter has been listed under the heading "For Orders" under the orders of Hon'ble the Chief Justice. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks from the date of lifting of the lockdown in the State of Bihar.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 272, 273, 353, 325, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30(A), 32(2) & 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act. The prosecution case, in short, is that 25 liters wine is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22360 of 2020(2) dt.10-09-2020 2/2 recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. Charge sheet/Prosecution report in this case has already been submitted. The petitioner is in custody since 26-03-2020. It is alleged that 25 liters wine is recovered in this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise, Muzaffarpur in connection with Sakra P.S. Case No. 117 of 2020.

(Sudhir Singh, J) A.K.V.//- U T