Chunnu Thakur @ Rakesh Thakur @ Rakesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20938 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-206 Year-2019 Thana- TURKAULIYA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Chunnu Thakur @ Rakesh Thakur @ Rakesh Kumar Son of Late Kailash Thakur R/O Mohalla - Gannipur, P.S.- Kazimohammadpur, District - Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anish Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 04-04-2025 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 324, 307, 120B, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of Arms Act. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had earlier moved before this Court seeking regular bail by filing Cr Misc No. 73475 of 2024 and the same was permitted to be withdrawn with a liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge by order dated 4-10-2024. It is next submitted that charges against the petitioner have been framed by order dated 26-11-2024 (Annxure-P/3)

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20938 of 2025(2) dt.04-04-2025 2/2 4.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

5.

Considering the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Turkauliya (Banjariya) P.S. Case No. 206 of 2019.

6.

It is made clear that if the learned trial court comes to a conclusion that the petitioner after his release is trying to delay the trial in any manner, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after recording reasons.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T