Ram Sagar Singh And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21376 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1187 Year-2012 Thana- NAWADAH COMPLAINT CASE District- Nawada ====================================================== 1.
Ram Sagar Singh and Ors Son of Late Ram Khelawan Singh Manager, Sahyog Samittee, Mafi PACS, Warsaliganj, Nawada. 2.
Shyam Sunder Dubey Son of Late Deo Narayan Dubey Anchal Adhikari, Warsaliganj, Anchal Nawada, District Nawadah. 3.
Rani Devi Wife of Sanoj Kumar Executive Member of Sahyog Samittee, Mafi PACS, Warsaliganj, Nawada.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
State Of Bihar 2.
Ranjeet Kumar Son of Late Kapildeo Singh Resident of Village Mafi, P.S. Warsaliganj, District Nawadah.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Devendra Prasad Singh, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 27-09-2023
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioners at the outset very fairly submits that during pendency of the quashing application, charges have been framed, it is further submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the complaint petition, it would manifest that the dispute was purely political and related to election for which the opposite party no.2 also moved before the learned Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Society by filing a miscellaneous case, in which the petitioner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21376 of 2017(3) dt.27-09-2023 2/2 was not impleaded as a party.
3. Learned APP Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad opposes the quashing application and submits that since charges have been framed, which signifies commencement of the trial, as such the Court should refrain from interfering with the impugned order.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners at this stage seeks permission to withdraw the quashing application.
5. Permission is accorded.
6. However, the Court expects that the learned trial court shall conclude the trial expeditiously and preferably within a period of one year from the date of production of a copy of this order as prolonged criminal trial causes mental agony. (Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T