Patna High CourtCR. MISC./25036/2024bail rejected

Monu Kumar @ Monu Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2024-05-01Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25036 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-87 Year-2024 Thana- BHABHUA District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== 1.

Monu Kumar @ Monu Kumar Singh son of Ram Parikha Singh VillageChauri Ps- Chand Dist- Kaimur (Bhabua) 2.

Sonu Kumar Singh son of Ram Parikha Singh Village- Chauri Ps- Chand Dist- Kaimur (Bhabua) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rakesh Kumar Mishra, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nand Kishore Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 01-05-2024 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable in connection with Bhabua P.S. Case No.87 of 2024 under Sections 8(c), 20(b) (ii), 27(a), 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

3. As per the prosecution, the FIR has been lodged against the petitioners against whom there is allegation that recovery of 5.600 Kg Ganja has been recovered from the house of one Ramparvesh Singh where they were tenant. Upon secret information, police team reached and searched then it has been found that 5.600 Kg and one electronic weighing machine have

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25036 of 2024(2) dt.01-05-2024 2/2 been recovered from their room.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. He submits that the petitioners are student and they have not been apprehended from the place of occurrence rather their name have been alleged in the F.I.R. at the instance of police.

5. Counsel also submits that petitioners' antecedent is clean.

6. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that recovery of 5.600 Kg Ganja which is N.D.P.S. material, has been recovered from the room where they were residing.

7. In the present facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, therefore the bail application of the petitioners is hereby rejected.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) Prakashmani/- U T