← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./2825/2015bail granted

Arun Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2015-05-25Justice Smt. Anjana Prakash3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.2825 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -80 Year- 2014 Thana -BARURAJ District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================

1. Arun Singh Son of Chandrika Singh

2. Chandrika Singh Son of Late Pudena Singh

3. Harendrra Paswan alias Hari Paswan Son of Late Lakhan Paswan

4. Jagdish Mahto Son of Late Preet Mahto

5. Sonelal Mahto Son ot Tilak Mahto

6. Jaimangal Rai alias Jai Mangal Ram son of Late Ramphal Mahto

7. Vinod Rai alias Vinod Ram Son of Late Ramu Rai

8. Shayam Dev Sah Son of Late Amir Sah

9. Mukesh Paswan Son of Mahadev Paswan

10. Kishori Ram Son of Ramphal Ram

11. Mohan Ram Son of Late Thaga Sah

12. Upendra Sah Son of Late Jagdish Sah

13. Mishri Lal Paswan Son of Bahadur Paswan

14. Chetan Ram Son of Sawun Ram

15. Visheshwar Sah Son of Late Sarjug Sah

16. Rakesh Ram Son of Late Gajadhar Ram

17. Raj Kumar Ram Son of Late Gajadhar Ram

18. Bhuneshwar Mahto Son of Late Bengali Mahto

19. Ramashray Paswan Son of Late Phaguder Paswan

20. Dharmendra Kumar Sah Son of Shivji Sah Nos.1 to 20 residents of Village - Harnahi, Police Station - Baruraj District - Muzffarpur.

21. Mohan Mahto Son of Bhuneshwar Mahto

22. Yogendra Paswan son of Late Lakhan Paswan

23. Kishore Mahto Son of Monik Mahto

24. Mukesh Mahto Son of Yogi Mahto alias Yogilal Mahto

25. Madan Pandit Son of Moti Pandit

26. Md. Shahinder Miyan alias Shaid Miyan Son of Ghafoor Miyan

27. Raj Alam alias Seraj Alam @Miraj Alam Son of Sarfuddin Miyan

28. Ram Chandra Pandit Son of Bhola Pandit Sl. Nos. 21 to 28 resident of village - Lakshmaniya, Police Station - Baruraj District - Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Syed Firoz Raza, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kr. Singh No.1 (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2825 of 2015 (4) dt.25-05-2015 2/3 25-05-2015 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and the State.

The Petitioners seek anticipatory bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 342, 323, 324, 307, 353, 333, 427, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Considering the same, let the Petitioners who have fair antecedents, in the event of surrender, named above, within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, in connection with Baruraj P.S. Case No. 80 of 2014, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the Court concerned to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioners. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not accused in any other case and if they are, they shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2825 of 2015 (4) dt.25-05-2015 3/3 other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled.

(Anjana Prakash, J) S.Ali/- U T