Abdul Haque v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24071 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-201 Year-2020 Thana- ARARIA District- Araria ====================================================== ABDUL HAQUE Son of Susumuddin Resident of Village- Gopalpur, P.S.- Korodagi, District- Uttar Dinajpur.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ramesh Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-09-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State also through video conferencing. Petitioner is an accused in a case registered for offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act 2016.

270 litres of foreign liquor has been recovered from the bolero which was driven by the petitioner. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. It is further submitted that the recovery have not been made from his conscious possession and he is no way concern with the recovery. Petitioner has got clean antecedent and he is in custody since 9.3.2020.

Considering the facts aforesaid, let the petitioner,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24071 of 2020(2) dt.18-09-2020 2/2 above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 2nd, Addl. Sessions Judge cum Special Judge, Araria in Araria (R.S.) Police Station Case No. 201 of 2020, on the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present, as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail-bonds shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the Petitioner tampers with the evidence of witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) SONALI/- U T