Sushama Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6267 of 2022 ====================================================== 1.

Sushama Kumari, wife of Alok Ranjan, resident of Village- West Daniyala, P.S.- Vansi, Block- Sonbhadra Vansi Suryapur, District- Arwal. At present Mohalla- Harnichak Anisabad, Patna, District- Patna. 2.

Saheb Dayal Singh, Son of Bashishath Singh, resident of VillageHalkhorichak, P.S.- Vansi, District- Arwal. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Principal Secretary Human Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Principal Secretary Personnel and Administrative Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Director Mass Education Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 5.

The District Education Officer, Arwal, District- Arwal. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arvind Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Jai Prabhat Kishore, AC to SC-13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 11-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents.

Having worked for sometime as Instructors in the Non-formal Education Programme, the petitioners are claiming parity with the beneficiaries of order dated 03.03.2017 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 384 of 2017.

It is submitted that the petitioners would approach the respondent authorities for similar relief.

The prayer is that the petitioners may be permitted to

Patna High Court CWJC No.6267 of 2022(2) dt.11-08-2022 2/2 approach Respondent Nos. 4 and 5.

In view of the limited submission, pendency of the instant writ petition would be futile as there is no adjudication called for in the instant writ proceedings.

For facilitating the consideration of the petitioners' claim in light of the judgment noted above, this application is disposed of.

The petitioners should make their representation within two weeks. The authority should consider the claim within three months.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) shashank/- U