Subhash Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26338 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-160 Year-2019 Thana- MANJHAGARH District- Gopalganj ====================================================== SUBHASH YADAV, Son of Chirkut Yadav Resident of Village - Koinee, P.S.- Manjhagarh, District - Gopalganj.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Binay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Abhay Kumar Ray, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 13-11-2020 In view of the submission and the undertaking of the learned counsel for the petitioner, at the time of hearing of this application through video conferencing, that he would remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office vide its notes dated 05.10.2020, within two weeks of starting of the Court proceeding in physical mode, he is permitted to remove the same accordingly.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State through video conferencing. The Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Manjhagarh P.S. Case No. 160 of 2019, registered under Sections 332, 333, 353 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 30(a), 41 and 45 of the Bihar Prohibition Excise Act, 2016 pending in the court of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26338 of 2020(2) dt.13-11-2020 2/2 learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Gopalganj.

The prayer for pre-arrest bail of the petitioner has already been rejected by this Court, on merit, on 17.10.2019 vide Criminal Miscellaneous No. 62460 of 2019, I find no any ground to reconsider the prayer for pre-arrest bail of the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail of the petitioner is, again, rejected.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T