← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./28936/2024bail granted

Md. Sajabul v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-23Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28936 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-562 Year-2023 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Supaul ====================================================== 1.

Md. Sajabul Son of Md. Samsul Resident of Village- Shahpur, Prithwipatti, Ward No. 2, P.S.- Bhaptiyahi, District- Supaul 2.

Bibi Basira @ Basira Khatoon W/o Md. Sajabul Resident of VillageShahpur, Prithwipatti, Ward No. 2, P.S.- Bhaptiyahi, District- Supaul 3.

Asmina Khatoon D/o Md. Sajabul Resident of Village- Shahpur, Prithwipatti, Ward No. 2, P.S.- Bhaptiyahi, District- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Rokhsar Praveen W/o Abubsar, D/o Md. Jasim Resident of Village- Naripur Shahpur Prithwipatti, Ward No. 2, P.S. Bhaptiyahi, District- Supaul ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pramod Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Arun Kumar Mr.Chandra Shekhar Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 23-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a complaint case punishable for the offence under Sections 498(A), 323, 341 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 / 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

3. Allegation against petitioners is of commission of torture and cruelty to the complainant for dowry.

4. Petitioner no. 1 is father-in-law, petitioner no. 2 is mother-in-law and petitioner no. 3 is sister-in-law of the complainant. Thrust of the accusation is against husband of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28936 of 2024(2) dt.23-07-2024 2/2 complainant. Petitioners are separate in mess and property and have got no concern with the affairs of the couple.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the complainant / O.P. No.2 vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioners.

6. However, considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioners, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. Ist Class, Supaul in connection with Complaint Case No. 562C of 2023, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J.) anay U T