← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./21813/2026partly allowed disposal

Sudarshan Nat v. The State Of Bihar

2026-04-08Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21813 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-220 Year-2025 Thana- JALALPUR District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

Sudarshan Nat S/O Late Gafoor Nat R/O Village- Vishupura, P.S- Jalalpur, Dist.- Saran.

2.

Govinda Nat S/O Sudarshan Nat R/O Village- Vishupura, P.S- Jalalpur, Dist.- Saran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mili Kumari, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sangeeta Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 08-04-2026 Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioners and Learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable in connection with Jalalpur P.S. Case No.220 of 2025 under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1) 76, 303(2), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.

3. As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against four named accused persons including the petitioners with allegation that they have assaulted the informant and his family members with sharp weapon due to which injury took place.

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21813 of 2026(2) dt.08-04-2026 2/3 petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. He submits that the allegation against petitioner No.2 is omnibus whereas petitioner No.1 has assaulted the on the head of Rikesh with Dabia.

5. Counsel submits that the criminal antecedent of the petitioners is clean. He further submits that the dispute has taken place on a petty issue relating to hanging of Tat (a type of curtain). He further submits that the petitioners are ready to fulfill all the conditions whatsoever shall be imposed upon them.

6. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioners and submits that petitioner No.1 is an old aged person about 55 years having allegation which does not constitute any offence, but against the petitioner No.2, the allegation of assault by Dabia (weapon of iron).

7. In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, let the petitioner No.1 namely, Sudarshan Nat, be granted bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Trial Court within a period of 4 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) each as mentioned in Section 2(1)(d) of the BNSS, 2023 to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Saran,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21813 of 2026(2) dt.08-04-2026 3/3 Chapra, in connection with Jalalpur P.S. Case No.220 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down U/s 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023.

8. So far as the petitioner No.2, namely, Govinda Nat, is concerned, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner No.2, therefore the bail application of the petitioner No.2 is hereby rejected.

9. However, trial court is directed to consider the regular bail application of the petitioner No.2, namely, Govinda Nat, if he surrenders within six weeks from today and prays for regular bail, then trial court shall pass order on merit without being prejudice of the present order preferably on the same day. (Dr. Anshuman, J) Prakashmani/- U T