Guru Deo Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27855 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-355 Year-2023 Thana- PIPRA District- Supaul ====================================================== 1.

Guru Deo Yadav Son of Buchu Yadav Resident of Village- Belokhara, Ward No. 05, Police Station- Pipara, District- Supaul 2.

Chandra Deo Yadav @ Chanardeo Yadav Son of Buchu Yadav Resident of Village- Belokhara, Ward No. 05, Police Station- Pipara, District- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Prafull Chandra Thakur For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mohammad Sufyan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 18-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 355 of 2023 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 342, 324, 504, 506, 307, 384, 354B and 379 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The allegation against the petitioners along with others is of assaulting the informant and his father due to which they sustained injury. It is further alleged that the accused persons snatched golden ring, cash and silver chain from the mother of the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27855 of 2024(2) dt.18-04-2024 2/2 the petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. He submitted that there has been delay of about 14 days in lodging the FIR. Both the parties are Gotiya and there was a land dispute going between the parties. There is a case and counter case between both the parties and members of both parties have sustained injury as alleged in a separate occurrence. The petitioners are in custody since 01.12.2023 and have no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody undergone by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

7. Let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 355 of 2023.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Arish/- U T