Patna High CourtCR. MISC./76857/2018bail granted

Sandeep Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2019-01-10Justice Smt. Anjana Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.76857 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-153 Year-2015 Thana- DARAUNDA District- Siwan ====================================================== Sandeep Yadav, Son of Late Ramnath Yadav, Resident of Village- Manpur, Police Station- Maharajganj, District- Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ramchandra Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 10-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

The petitioner is in custody since 11.06.2018 in connection with Daraunda P.S. Case No.153 of 2015 dated 10.06.2015 registered under Sections 395, 397 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though not named in the F.I.R., he has been falsely implicated in the present case on the basis of a confessional statement made before the police which has no evidentiary value. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is alleged to be having several antecedents.

Considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.76857 of 2018(2) dt.10-01-2019 2/2 bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VI, Siwan in connection with Daraunda P.S. Case No.153 of 2015, subject to the following conditions :

(1) One of the bailors will be the brother of the petitioner.

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of his failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) Nasimul/P.N.M.

U T