Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43137/2016bail granted

Jai Ram Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2017-02-10Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.43137 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -612 Year- 2014 Thana -SASARAM NAGAR District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== Jai Ram Choudhary, Son of Raj Kumar Chaudhary, Resident of MuhallaKhirkighat, P.S. Sasaram, District Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhinay Raj, Advocate For the Opposite Party: APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 10-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 25.06.2015 in connection with Sasaram (T) P.S. Case No. 612 of 2014 for the offences alleged under Sections 302 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and the first information report has been instituted against unknown person. The informant is admittedly not an eyewitness whereas later on, the daughter of the deceased along with her servant turned up claiming to be the eye witnesses and has implicated the petitioner and co-accused Nanhak Choudhary, who has since been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 47019 of 2015. It is further submitted that the charge sheet has already been submitted.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43137 of 2016 (4) dt.10-02-2017 2/2 of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Sasaram (T) P.S. Case No. 612 of 2014 with the following conditions:

(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) B.T/Chandran U T