Kariya Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.49189 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -337 Year- 2015 Thana -BRAHMPUR District- BUXAR ======================================================

1. Kariya Yadav Son of Bhagelu Yadav, Resident of Village- Chhatanwar, P.S.- Krishna Brahm, District- Buxar.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bachan Jee Ojha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Rajballabh Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 20-01-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code in connection with Brahmpur P.S. Case No. 337/2015. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that on confessional statement of the petitioner himself his name transpired in this case and he is languishing in jail for about four months. No doubt there are cases against the petitioner but in all cases the petitioner is on bail and all the cases are prior to 2012. No fresh case has been lodged against this petitioner.

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor could not controvert the aforesaid fact.

Having heard both sides, no doubt there is large number

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49189 of 2016 (3) dt.20-01-2017 2/2 of cases against the petitioner but so far this case is concerned, except confessional statement there is nothing against the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in connection with Brahmpur P.S. Case No. 337/2015, subject to conditions that one of the bailors should be relative of the petitioners and another having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court below with further condition that he will make himself available before the court on each and every day and on failure to appear on two consecutive dates without any appropriate reason will be liable for cancellation of his bail.

The court below is directed to strictly follow the said conditions.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J.) Rakhi U T