Patna High CourtSA/38/1992dfd for non appearance

Dr.Ram Sagar Singh v. Most.Parbati Kuer And ORS

2025-09-02Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

SECOND APPEAL No.38 of 1992 ====================================================== Dr. Ram Sagar Singh, Son of Late Jagarnath Singh, Resident of Village and P.O.-Madarpur, P.S. Mashrak, District- Saran. ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1. Most. Parbati Kuer widow of Binayak Roy.

2. Radhika Devi, Wife of Janardan Roy.

Both residents of Village-Madarpur, P.S. Mashrak, District- Saran.

3. Pashupatiya Wife of Nagina Roy, at present resident of Village- Madarpur, P.S. Mashrak, District- Saran.

4. Megh Nath Roy @ Mokhtar Rai.

5. Bacha Roy.

6. Parbhu Roy.

Respondent Nos. 4 to 6 are sons of Binayak Roy, deceased, resident of Village-Madarpur. P.S. Mashrak, P.O. Madarpur, District- Saran. ... ...Defendant/s / Appellant/s / Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

None ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 02-09-2025 On several dates i.e., on 23.06.2022, 04.08.2022, 13.10.2022, 13.04.2023, 21.02.2025, 18.08.2025 and 25.08.2025, nobody appears on behalf of the learned counsel for the appellant.

2. On perusal of the records, it appears that this second appeal is of the year 1992 and the appellant is absented

Patna High Court SA No.38 of 1992(19) dt.02-09-2025 2/2 from 2022 and even today on repeated calls, no one appears on behalf of the appellant as well as notices have validly been served against them as reported in the office notes dated 30.08.2025, so in this circumstances, this second appeal is dismissed for default under Order 41 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Anand Kr.