Vikash Kumar And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.75132 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-342 Year-2018 Thana- LAHERIMUHALLA District- Nalanda ======================================================
1. Vikash Kumar son of Indradeo Prasad, resident of VillageRahui, Police Station- Rahui, District- Nalanda.
2. Chandan Kumar @ Mukhiya son of Narendra Kumar @ Navendu Kumar, resident of Village- Bari Aat, Police Station- Ben, District- Nalanda.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Anil Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. S. Ehteshamuddin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 14-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Petitioners seek bail in Laheri P.S. Case No.342 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 30(a), 37(B)(C) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016. Allegation is recovery of 49.170 litres of foreign liquor from the rented house of the petitioners. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they have falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioners. Petitioners are in custody since 26.10.2018. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners named above be released on bail
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.75132 of 2018(2) dt.14-12-2018 2/2 upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned VI Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Excise, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Laheri P.S. Case No.342 of 2018 with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.
(2) Petitioners shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court.
(3) If the petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.
(4) If the petitioners are found involved in similar nature of offences, after their release on bail the trial court shall take steps to cancel their bail bond.
(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T