Anshu Kumar @ Anshu Sharma v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24944 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1181 Year-2022 Thana- KHAJANCHI HAT District- Purnia ====================================================== Anshu Kumar @ Anshu Sharma S/o Late Alok Sharma R/o Sharma Tola, Satsang Mandir Madhubani, P.S. - Madhubani (T.O.P), Distt. - Purnia ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Dr. Bidhu Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Shahabuddin Azeem @ S. Azeem, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 01-05-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341/323/307/504/506 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3⁄4 of the Explosive Substance Act.
3. As per the allegation made in the FIR the petitioner has assaulted by iron rod on the backside of the informant's son and subsequent allegation is that he has bursted crackers on the back of the informant's side.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He submits that the alleged occurrence took place in the month of October. The period of Dipawali was going on and the only mistake the petitioner had done that he was bursting the crackers
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24944 of 2024(2) dt.01-05-2024 2/2 on the roadside, due to which this unfortunate event took place and the son of the informant became injured. Counsel submits that in the impugned order it has come that doctor has found simple injury on the head. Counsel further submits that antecedent of the petitioner is clean. He also submits that vide Annexure-P/2 the informant and accused family set together in presence of the well wisher of the society and resolved the issue and not interested to pursue this matter further.
5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.
6. In the present facts and circumstances, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the order on furnishing bail bond of Rs.30,000/- (Thirty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea/Successor Court in connection with K. Hat (Madhubani) P.S. Case No.1181 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Dr. Anshuman, J) Mkr./- U T