← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./44705/2015withdrawn

Santosh Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-07-30Mr. Justice Birendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44705 of 2015 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-200 Year-2013 Thana- BUXAR COMPLAINT CASE DistrictBuxar ====================================================== Santosh Singh Son of late Laxman Singh resident of Village Kharwaniya, P.S Dhansoin, District Buxar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

Kamal Singh son of late Vishwanath Singh 3.

Motijharo Devi wife of Kamal Singh 4.

Nirmal Singh 5.

Dhanji singh Both sons of Kamal Singh All resident of Village- Kharwaniya ,P.S. Dhansion, District Buxar. 6.

Daya Shankar Singh son of Sri Kishun Singh resident of Village- Arang, P.S Dinara, District Rohtas.

7.

Ram Bhajan Ram Son of (Name not Known to the Petitioner) Circle officer, Anchal Rajpur P.S Rajpur ,District Buxar.

8.

The Circle Inspector name not known to the Petitioner 9.

Sidheshwar Rai son of (not known to the Petitioner) Both Anchal Rajpur , P.s Rajpur District Buxar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bishwa Nath Chaudhary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 30-07-2019 The complainant had brought Complaint Case No.200(C) of 2013 against Opposite Party Nos.2 to 9 in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Buxar. The complaint petition was dismissed on 26.11.2013 under Section 203 Cr.P.C. on the ground that the allegation makes out a case of pure civil nature.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44705 of 2015(2) dt.30-07-2019 2/2 The petitioner challenged the aforesaid order before the learned Sessions Judge, Buxar, in Cr. Revision No.199 of 2013. The said criminal revision was dismissed considering the fact that there was no illegality or irregularity with the order of dismissal of the complaint.

After some argument learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to agitate his grievance in a civil proceeding before the appropriate forum.

Accordingly, this application stands dismissed as withdrawn.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Mkr./- U T