Ashok Kumar Das v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.1557 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -262 Year- 2015 Thana -KATIHAR District- KATIHAR ====================================================== Ashok Kumar Das, s/o late Baid Nath Das @ Baijnath Das, r/m Mofarganj, Dhalaighar, P.S.-Katihar Town, District-Katihar. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Jagdhar Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 18-01-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Katihar Town P.S. Case No. 262/2015, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363 and 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner wants to renew his prayer of bail which was earlier twice rejected by order dated 08.01.2016 and 27.07.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 45996/2015 and Cr. Misc. No. 30134/2016 respectively on the ground that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 05.05.2015 and uptill now six witnesses have been examined, but the victim has not been examined and in near future the trial is not likely to be concluded. Direction was given to conclude the trial within three months and liberty was given to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1557 of 2017 (2) dt.18-01-2017 2/2 Learned A.P.P. fairly submits that as per direction of this Court, the trial has not been concluded.
In the facts and circumstances stated above, now the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Katihar in connection with Katihar (Town) P.S. Case No. 262/2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rakhi U T