Satya Prakash Vidyarthi And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41647 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -611 Year- 2013 Thana - Munger Complaint Case District- Munger ==================================================

1. Satya Prakash Vidyarthi Son of Late Raj Kumar Vidyarthi

2. Veena Bharti Wife of Satya Prakash Vidyarthi

3. Satya Prakash Gupta Son of Late Rajneeti Prasad Sao

4. Suraj Prakash @ Suraj Prakash Gupta Son of Prithwi Raj Gupta

5. Prithvi Raj Gupta Son of Late Ayodhya Sah All Resident of Station Road Bariyarpur, District -Munger

6. Vashistha Prasad @ Vashistha Prasad Sah Son of Late Bhola Mandal Resident of Village - Mahudipur, P.S.- Kasim Bazar, District - Munger .... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Shyamal Maharaj Son of Late Ram Kumar Maharaj Resident of Station Road Bariyarpur, P.S.- Bariyarpur, District - Munger at present residing at Mundichak, P.S. Kotwali, Bhagalpur, District - Bhagalpur. .... .... Opposite Parties.

================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-04-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in relation to Complaint Case No. 611(C) of 2013 for the offences under Sections 406, 467, 468, 471 of the Indian Penal Code.

From reading the order of learned Sessions Judge, Munger, in Anticipatory Bail Application No.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41647 of 2014 (2) dt.10-04-2015 513/2014, it is apparent that it is clearly a case of civil dispute and for the reasons, as noted by the learned Sessions Judge, this application for bail, in anticipation of arrest, is allowed.

In the event of arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks from today, let the abovenamed petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri S.K. Singh, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Munger, in connection with Complaint Case No. 611(C) of 2013, subject to condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.) Rajeev/- U T