Jitendra Kumar @ Jitendra Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23343 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-18 Year-2025 Thana- KUTUMBA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Jitendra Kumar @ Jitendra Kumar Singh Son of Sudarshan Singh @ Sudarshan Choudhary R/O Vill- Chandui, P.S.-Kudra, District- Kaimur (Bhabhua) ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Kumari Ruchi For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms. Asha Devi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Kutumba P.S. Case No. 18 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under sections 304 B.N.S..
3. As per allegation in the FIR, informant is engaged in Gramin Kota Ltd. Company as a field Officer and posted at Nabi Nagar. On 30.01.2025, when he was going to his office after collecting an amount of Rs. 61,187/- by his motorcycle, three miscreants came there by two motorcycles and intercepted his motorcycle and snatched his bag containing money and key of the motorcycle and thereafter fled away.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23343 of 2025(2) dt.28-04-2025 2/2 that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner is not named in the FIR rather the same is against three unknown. Looted amount has been recovered from possession of accused Ankit Kumar and on his confessional statement made before the police, petitioner's name has been surfaced in this case. Petitioner is a person of clean antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 06.02.2025.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail after framing of charge. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Aurangabad in connection with Kutumba P.S. Case No. 18 of 2025.
(S. B. Pd. Singh, J) sushma/- U