Sitaram Baitha @ Raghu Baith v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.50662 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -139 Year- 2016 Thana -PARIHAR District- SITAMARHI ====================================================== Sitaram Baitha @ Raghu Baith Son of late Rajendra Baitha Resident of Village- Koiriya Pinra, P.S. Parihar, Distt Sitamarhi. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Virendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-11-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Parihar P.S. Case No. 139 of 2016 for the offences instituted under Sections 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 47 of Bihar Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016.

It is alleged that 1.200 liters of Nepali wine is said to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. It is alleged that 1.200 liters of Nepali wine is said to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. There is no

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50662 of 2016 (2) dt.25-11-2016 2/2 compliance of Section 100 of the Cr.P.C.

On behalf of the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Parihar P.S. Case No. 139 of 2016 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Sitamarhi, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J.) Amit/- U T