Munni Lall Ravidas @ Munilal Ravidas v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23597 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-270 Year-2019 Thana- PIRPAINTI District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== MUNNI LALL RAVIDAS @ MUNILAL RAVIDAS Son of Late Lachhu Ravidas Resident of Village - Kujbanna, P.S. Pirpainti, District - Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bijendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ganesh Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 25-08-2022 Heard the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks of resumption of normal court proceedings. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within stipulated period, office will place the matter before the Bench. The petitioner apprehends her arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 147, 341, 323, 307, 379, 504, 506, 354(A) of the IPC.

Allegedly, the petitioner alongwith other accused persons assaulted the informant by means of deadly weapons due to which she sustained injuries.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to enmity and grudge. No

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23597 of 2022(2) dt.25-08-2022 2/2 such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation leveled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is no specific overt act against the petitioner. Both the sides are next door neighbours. In the alleged occurrence, both sides sustained injuries and the injuries are simple in nature. Petitioner has one criminal antecedent, as also mentioned in para-3 of the bail application.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since both sides sustained injuries and the injuries are simple in nature, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in Pirpainty P.S. Case No.270 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T