Dr. Jagannath Mishra Mahavidyalaya v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15663 of 2015 ======================================================
1. Dr. Jagannath Mishra Mahavidyalaya, Mau, Gaya Shikshak Karmachari Shoshan Mukti Sangharsh Samiti through its Convener Dr. Tapsi Kumar S/o Saligram Yadav Lecturer, Department of Geography, Resident of Village Pakari, Police Station Coanch in the District of Gaya. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Director, Secondary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.
4. The Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board (S.S.), Budha Marg, Patna, Bihar.
5. The District Magistrate, Gaya.
6. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Gaya.
7. The Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar, Gaya.
8. The Managing Committee of Dr. Jagannath Mishra mahavidyalaya, Mau, District Gaya.
9. Rakesh Ranjan @ Santosh Mishra S/o Ashok Kumar Mishra Resident of Village + Post Office Mau, Police Station Tekari, District Gaya. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranvijay Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anjani Kumar, AAG-6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ) 08-02-2016 Heard Mr. Ranvijay Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Anjani Kumar, learned Additional Advocate General No. 6, appearing for the State respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and/or to take
Patna High Court CWJC No.15663 of 2015 (2) dt.08-02-2016 recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. To the submissions so made, no objection has been raised on behalf of the respondents.
In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.
(I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Hemant Gupta, J) A.I./- U