Umesh Prajapati v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25875 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-204 Year-2017 Thana- RAFIGANJ District- Aurangabad ====================================================== UMESH PRAJAPATI, S/o Nanhak Prajapati, Resident of Village - Jakhim, P.O.- Jakhim, P.S. - Rafiganj, District - Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Bhaskar Shankar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 27-01-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Petitioner is husband of the victim of dowry death. Petitioner is in custody since 28.05.2018.
In the past, prayer for bail was refused on 11.06.2019 in Cr. Misc. No. 52528 of 2018, with direction to the learned Trial Judge to conclude the trial preferably within a period of nine months and petitioner was allowed liberty to renew the prayer for bail, if the trial is not concluded within the aforesaid period.
The report of the learned Trial Judge would reveal that there is no chance of early conclusion of the trial as no
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25875 of 2020(3) dt.27-01-2021 2/2 prosecution witness has turned up after 28.02.2020. Considering the facts aforesaid, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Sessions Trial No. 238 of 2018/270 of 2018 arising out of Rafiganj Police Station Case No. 204 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (a) The petitioner shall fully cooperate with the trial of the case, failing which the learned court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. (b) Both the bailors shall be resident of the territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below.
(c) The petitioner shall not leave the country without permission of the learned trial court.
(Birendra Kumar, J) Kundan/- U T