Bimlesh Kumar @ Bimlesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22407 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-34 Year-2022 Thana- Banshi District- Arwal ====================================================== Bimlesh Kumar @ Bimlesh Yadav Son of Mahesh Yadav @ Mahesh Singh Resident of Village- Balaura, P.S.- Banshi, District- Arwal ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Sr. Advocate Mr.Priyanka Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Shyam Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 02-09-2025 Heard learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Banshi P.S. Case No. 34 of 2022 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 201 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per allegation in the FIR, on getting information about a trolley bag in abandoned condition lying in the filed of Rameshwar Sing having blood stain, police party proceeded towards place of occurrence. In presence of public, trolley bag was opened in which a dead body of a female was found. It transpired that after killing at some other place, with a view to conceal the dead body, the same was thrown by keeping it in trolley bag.

4. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22407 of 2025(4) dt.02-09-2025 2/2 that the husband of the deceased is one Mihir Kumar, who is alleged to have killed his wife and the petitioner and other coaccused have participated in the disposal of the dead body. He further submits that no offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code is made out against the petitioner and offence of Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code can be made out against the petitioner which is bailable in nature. The petitioner is in custody since 25.04.2024.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned District & Sessions Judge-I, Arwal/ concerned Court in connection with Banshi P.S. Case No. 34 of 2022, subject to the condition that the petitioner will co-operate in the trial.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) P. Kumar U T