Rupesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.75082 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-546 Year-2018 Thana- BHAGALPUR KOTWALI DistrictBhagalpur ====================================================== Rupesh Kumar Son of Sri Jyotish Kumar Paswan@ Jyotish Paswan Resident of Village- Sahabad, P.S. Sultanganj, District- Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Gupta, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sri Brajendra Nath Pandey (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 14-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Kotwali (Jogsar) P.S. Case No. 546 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 379, 411 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation is that petitioner was caught red handed while he was stealing the motorcycle of informant. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case only he was sitting on the said motorcycle and on suspicion has been made accused. He is in custody since 19.08.2018.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.75082 of 2018(2) dt.14-12-2018 2/2 Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Bhagalpur, in connection with Kotwali (Jogsar) P.S. Case No. 546 of 2018, subject to conditions:
(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.
(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.
(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/- U T