Dani Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40776 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -163 Year- 2015 Thana -BIHIYA District- BHOJPUR ====================================================== Dani Yadav s/o late Dwarika Yadav, resident of Village- Hospital Road, P.S.- Bihiya, District- Bhojpur.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajani Ranjan Pd. Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 29-09-2016 Heard Sri Rajani Ranjan Prasad Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Addl. Public Prosecutor. The sole petitioner, who is named as accused in Bihiya P.S. Case No.163/15 registered for the offence under Sections 385, 387, 506 of the Indian Penal Code, has prayed for grant of bail.

It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. He submits that the petitioner, at the relevant time, was inside the jail and the police during investigation had not verified the mobile number, from which call was made to the informant regarding demand of Rs. 2 lacs.

However, on perusal of paragraph-3 of the petition,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40776 of 2016 (2) dt.29-09-2016 2/2 it is evident that the petitioner is habitual offender and he is accused in number of cases relating to serious offences. Keeping in view the criminal antecedent of the petitioner, I do not find any ground to extend the privilege of bail. The petition stands dismissed.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) NKS/- U T