Aman Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23920 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-738 Year-2018 Thana- GOPALGANJ TOWN DistrictGopalganj ====================================================== 1.

AMAN SINGH Son of Upendra Singh Resident of Village - Sareya, Ward No.1, P.S.- Gopalganj, Distt.- Gopalganj. 2.

Ashique Singh @ Shantanu Kumar Resident of Village - Sareya, Ward No.3, P.S.- Gopalganj, Distt.- Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Naresh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Chandra Bhushan Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 24-06-2019 At the very outset, submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that during the pendency of this application, petitioner no.2 Ashique Singh @ Shantanu Kumar has died. In view of that the application against the petitioner no.2 stands dismissed as withdrawn.

So far petitioner no.1 is concerned, he is apprehending his arrest in connection with Gopalganj P.S.Case No.738 of 2018 registered for offences punishable under Sections 447, 448, 341, 323, 506, 354, 427, 387 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner no.1 is that he entered inside the Training Centre run under 'DDUGKY', damaged the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23920 of 2019(4) dt.24-06-2019 2/2 property, threatened the staff and also assaulted the staff and the children including the ladies.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that both the parties are neighbors and the whole allegation is false and concocted and they have compromised the case also. Heard learned A.P.P. , who has opposed the prayer for bail on the ground that the witnesses have also supported the same. . Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner no.1, above named, however, let the petitioner no.1 surrender before the learned court below and make prayer for regular bail, which will be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by the order of this Court, if possible to be disposed of on the same day.

With the aforesaid direction, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T