Santosh Narayan Yadav @ Santosh Kumar Yadav @ Suraj Samrat v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.53398 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -682 Year- 2016 Thana -SAHARSA District- SAHARSA ======================================================

1. SANTOSH NARAYAN YADAV @ SANTOSH KUMAR YADAV @ SURAJ SAMRAT, son of Bhuvneshwari Yadav, resident of VillageMahmadpur, P.S.- Nauhatta, District- Saharsa, at present resident of Sant Nagar, Ward No.15, Gangjala, P.S.- Saharsa, District- Saharsa. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sameer Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jai Narain Thakur ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 22-12-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

This is an application for grant of regular bail for offences punishable under Sections 384, 386 and 387 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has not been named in the First Information Report but later on his name transpired only on account of confessional statement made by a co-accused of this case and there is no recovery from the possession of the petitioner and he has been in judicial custody since 09.09.2016 and now the charge-sheet has also been submitted.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.53398 of 2016 (3) dt.22-12-2016 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P. also could not controvert this fact that save and except the confessional statement of accused, there is nothing against the petitioner.

Having heard both sides and in view of the fact that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R, his name transpired on account of confessional statement of co-accused and the petitioner has been in judicial custody since 09.09.2016, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 (Rs. Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M, Saharsa in connection with Saharsa P.S. Case No. 682 of 2016 with the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be a local person, having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court and fully cooperate with the Trial/investigation as the case may be and shall appear himself, as and when required by the Police/Court and in the event of failure on his part to appear on two consecutive occasions, without assigning any valid reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T