Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6400/2014bail granted

Amardeep Kumar @ Niraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2015-04-13The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6400 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -43 Year- 2013 Thana -KATRAHA District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================

1. Amardeep Kumar @ Niraj Kumar Son Of Sri Om Prakash Singh Resident Of Village - Chakbajo, P.S.- Saraiya, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. Gunjan Kumari, Daughter of Shankar Singh, resident of villageThegadih, P.S.- Kartaha, District- Vaishali. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bela Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Manish Kumar 2 (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 13-04-2015 The petitioner figured as accused in Kartaha P.S. Case No.43 of 2013, registered on the basis of a complaint submitted by the wife of the petitioner alleging offences including one punishable under Section-498A of I.P.C. Apprehending arrest, the petitioner filed A.B.P. No.1522/2013 in the court of learned Sessions Judge, Vaishali. The learned Judge rejected the application through order dated 4.1.2014. Hence, this application for grant of anticipatory bail under Section-438 of Cr.P.C. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Whether one goes by the nature of allegations or the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the recent

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6400 of 2014 (4) dt.13-04-2015 2/2 past, the arrest of a person who figured as accused in a case wherein offences punishable under Section-498A of I.P.C. is alleged, is not at all warranted.

Therefore, the application is allowed.

The order dated 24.12.2014 granting provisional anticipatory bail to the petitioner shall be treated as one granting anticipatory bail subject to the conditions that:- (a) if any arrangement ordered by this Court on earlier occasion, it shall be in force till the disposal of the case before the trial court;

(b) the petitioner shall be under obligation to live with and maintain his wife, if she is otherwise willing; and (c) disposal of this application shall be without prejudice to the proceedings for mediation, if any. (L. Narasimha Reddy,CJ) K.C.jha/- U