Shanti Devi @ Shanti Devi Hansda v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41574 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -82 Year- 2016 Thana -KOCHADHAMAN District- KISANGANJ ====================================================== Shanti Devi @ Shanti Devi Hansda W/o Late Hembram Hansda @ Late Lakhi Hambram Hansda, Resident of Village-Chargharia, P.S.- Kochadhaman, District-Kishanganj .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Satish Kumar Sinha, Adv. For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 18-10-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 06.05.2016 in connection with Kochadhaman P.S. Case No. 82 of 2016 for the offences alleged under Section 290 of the Indian Penal Code and 47A of the Bihar Excise Amendment Act, 2016.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated on the confessional statement of co-accused Akalu Lal and no recovery of liquor has been made from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is a lady and claims clean antecedents.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj, in connection with Kochadhaman P.S. Case No. 82 of 2016, with the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41574 of 2016 (2) dt.18-10-2016 the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure to do so on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, her bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/BT U T